2 Migraine-inducingly Moronic Posts

 No commentary, no attempts to rationalize. Just gaze, if you dare, on the stupid!

Godzilla Movies that Present Compelling Human Drama, Too Part One

 

The deservedly positive buzz about "Godzilla: Minus One" is often centered on how well-presented the human drama is, conventional wisdom being that movies featuring Godzilla don't tend to do well in that arena. Arguably, this isn't an incorrect point but, in my opinion many of the films prior to Toho's crowning achievement are dismissed unfairly.

Below is a list of every Godzilla film up to the beginning of the "Millennium Series" I feel does a good job with the human aspect of their plots, in release order. I'm skipping the original film because...come on. It's a work of art.

Godzilla Vs. King Kong (1962)- The third film in the Showa Era series is an enjoyable retelling of the original King Kong with Japanese flourishes and, of course, a certain mutated dinosaur. The human drama is effective and well-handled, especially its sly indictment of the pharmaceutical industry.

Invasion of Astro-Monster (1965)- None other than Nick Freakin' Adams co-stars in this one and his passionate acting adds much needed gravitas to this installment that features aliens and the return of the three-headed King Ghidorah. This film could also be viewed as a prototypical buddy cop film with astronauts instead of detectives. The close friendship between Fuji and Glenn is fun and touching, as if Glenn's love for Namikawa, the conflicted spy for the malevolent aliens using kaiju to take over Earth (First time this eventual trope is used).

All Monsters Attack, a.k.a. Godzilla's Revenge (1969)- I know, I know. It's easily the worst and even dumbest Godzilla movie ever made, especially because none of the kaiju action actually happens outside of a boy's imagination. But you know what? Maybe it's because I was around the kid's age when I first saw it, but watching young Ichiro get bullied and eventually learn how to defend himself makes for some rather compelling human drama.

Godzilla vs. Gigan (1973)- When I saw this one in the movie theater, it was called, "Godzilla on Monster Island." It has a bad reputation because of its reliance on stock footage and obvious budget slashing but, dammit, Gengo the failed comic book artist is one interesting, if pathetic, character. It was rare in those days to see a Japanese film feature such an intensely flawed protagonist with a redemption arc.

Terror of Mechagodzilla (1975)- Perhaps because the winner of the screenwriting contest whose work became Ishiro Honda's last Godzilla film was a woman, this film has a heart at its center that hadn't been seen since the 1954 original. Yes, it has the by now requisite scientists and INTERPOL agents and aliens returning for another power grab, but it also features a tormented, embittered scientist whose love for his daughter causes him to collaborate with humanity's potential destructors. It also features a tragic love story between the half-machine daughter and one of our heroes. The scene where Katsura is turned into a cyborg is one of the most heartbreaking moments in Godzilla film history.

Godzilla vs. King Ghidorah (1991)- Easily the most fun of the Hesei Era movies, GVKG also features an interesting twist with visitors from the future and a would-be bestselling author whose true identity is "Empire Strikes Back" Luke and Leia kissing level disturbing. The characters are likable and interesting and we care what happens to them.

Godzilla vs. Mothra (1992)- Serving as a direct sequel to GVKG, Godzilla's presence is more force of nature this time than reluctant savior. This one features a wanna-be Indiana Jones named Takuya whose bumbling lands him in a Southeast Asian prison. Fortunately for him, his ex-wife works for the Japanese Prime Minister and his skills are needed on Infant Island, the home of Mothra. The relationship between the two divorcees and their child adds a human element and investment that is rarely present in kaiju films.

Godzilla vs, SpaceGodzilla (1994)- Considered the most out-of-place and ridiculous of the Hesei films, GVSG is also a ton of fun and a welcome change in tone from its two more solemn predecessors. By this time, the character of Miki Saegusa whose psychic abilities help her bond with Godzilla, is kidnapped by Yakuza members looking to control Godzilla. And in the midst of all this, there's a guy with a sniper rifle obsessed with taking Godzilla out himself. Pyrotechnics and frantic kaiju action are beautifully framed by a tale of revenge and greed.

Godzilla 2000 (1999)- The first of the Millennium Era films, "Godzilla 2000" lets us see Godzilla from a human perspective for the first time in decades. No longer is he a faraway entity to be feared or cheered. Now we see him as an immediate issue that is both a threat and our only hope. All of this is perfectly embodied by the character of Yuji Shinoda, an independent researcher whose work falls into undeserving hands. His relationship with his daughter and adversarial relationship with self-important businessman Katagiri make this a film about people as well as monsters and aliens.

Part II coming soon!

SHORT STORY ACCEPTANCE

 Having been incapacitated since the day after Thanksgiving from COVID, I was pleased to wake up this morning to a short story acceptance by Ghostlight Magazine. The editor's letter was most welcome indeed!

Good evening, Chris! 

Thank you for your patience. I am happy to accept "In the Freezer" for the spring issue of Ghostlight. I hope you are pleased. 

Your piece is darkly fun and I love the twist ending. This is the kind of story I want in our anthology. 

I will send the contract this week. 

Be well.

Nicole e. Castle

Editor, Ghostlight 

I will post the appropriate link once I know more.

"Barbie;" The Review I Probably Shouldn't be Publishing but to Hell with it.

Only the least media savvy individual in the world missed the absurd conflation of the "Barbie" movie and Chris Nolan's latest film, "Oppenheimer," i.e. the biopic that isn't a biopic because he said so and 

SO THERE!!!

I must confess a lack of interest in either film when they were released into theaters but I knew I would probably see them both once they came to home media. As "luck" would have it, I saw "Barbie" first; just the other day, in fact. And since I haven't felt compelled to review a film on this blog in a long while, it should be obvious that I had a rather strong reaction to it, although not the way cheerleaders and detractors might expect.

The plot of the Greta Gerwig-directed  film can be summed up as follows: Barbie dolls and Ken dolls live in a plastic world made up of their playsets and vehicles and blissfully live out the same scenarios on a daily basis without once questioning any of it. They believe the real world is run by strong, intelligent women whose inspiration came from the very Barbie dolls that reside in this sub-reality. However, one day Stereotypical Barbie (Margot Robbie) starts having thoughts of death and a feeling of not belonging.

Wacky antics ensue as our heroine seeks help from (sigh) Weird Barbie (Kate McKinnon in a surprisingly subdued, lackluster performance) whose appearance is bizarre because some psychotic little girl subjected her doll to some truly disturbing shit. Why she's the wise woman o' the mountain is never explained but that's what she is and soon our Barbie is traveling to the real world to find the little girl whose unusual play has caused her ennui. Oh, and Ryan Gosling's Ken comes along for the ride because he loves her even though she doesn't love him.

The first third of this film is rather enjoyable. Most of the jokes work and the acting, minus Gosling's bizarre timing, is very good as well. The juxtaposition of Barbie and Ken in the real world is amusing if all-too-brief, but the world they find themselves in doesn't feel all that real. In fact, it seems equally artificial to Barbie's reality. That's where the first of several missteps takes place.

The real world in "Barbie" is not the world you and I live in, it's the product of a limited imagination designed to make a sociopolitical point one could find in any first semester college student's term paper. For whatever reason, Gerwig and her co-writer Noah Baumbach decided to make an entire movie with that conceit.

Before one can utter the phrase, "Abandoned plot point," Barbie locates the girl she's looking for in record time without an ounce of dramatic tension or struggle. If it's almost as if this isn't the movie's real point...Anyway...

A plot twist worthy of a 1970s sitcom ensues once we realize the identity of the actual "little girl" and suddenly there's a car chase as Barbie evades the incredibly incompetent Mattel executives who want to put her literally back in the box for...reasons.

Let's pause here for a moment: Those execs whose jobs depend on running a successful company seem to want Barbie back in Dreamland so the toys don't change. But when they do change, the profits continue rolling in. So, why are they still chasing her? And when she does go back, why do they follow her at a snail's pace, only to show up when the plot calls for them to help resolve it in the lamest way possible? There's really only one sensible explanation: Gerwig and Baumbach are hacks.

The "why" of it all grows exponentially as more things happen as if plucked from a deceased magician's hat. Ken witnesses examples of toxic masculinity such as guy's talking to each other and riding horses so he can return to Dreamland and install a patriarchal system to replace the matriarchal one he and the other Kens have suffered under for decades. Yeah! Stick it to the...man?

Barbie experiences an epiphany in a matter of moments when she sees people smiling and a lovely elderly woman sharing a park bench with her. "These are people," she appears to think, "Real people doing real people things. How nice. How beautiful. How tragic. Well, time to go live a lie some more!" Now, if that isn't the most poignant statement on how women are often made to eke out their existences, I don't know what is. But that's too introspective for a film that wears its grievances on its sleeve, and so we're whisked away to more wacky antics and self-conscious dialogue as the dreaded third act rears its hideous countenance.

American movies often suffer from lackluster, underdeveloped third acts. Much of this comes from studio involvement and their insistence upon focus groups and sneak previews. I doubt that was what happened here though. Remember, this whole movie is designed to prove a point and what better way to do it than to reverse everything the audience saw at the beginning?

Actually, there are at least three ways that would have been better, but I'm reviewing the movie we got, not the one that exists in a parallel universe where actual thought was put into things like story and plot progression.

The result of Ken's observations of stereotypical masculinity have resulted in a very different world than the one Barbie left on her quest. But worry not, for the triumph of plastic womanhood is a mere long-winded speech nobody would every utter in real life away from retaking Dreamland and instituting an even more oppressive form of matriarchy than existed previously. 

Yay?

I often complain about horror movies lacking third acts but if this is the kind we get in other genres, maybe it's for the best. One unfunny, idiotic sight gag after another takes place as the Kens go to war over something poorly defined like their girlfriends going off with other Kens. The battle takes place using sports gear because I guess that's funny. Then a dance-off happens because I guess recycled Eighties humor is funny, too. By the time the forgettable song started, I had long ago mentally checked out. 

I realize this movie was hailed as some sort of deeply philosophical clarion call for feminism but all it really does is insult the audience's intelligence and diminish the very real issues woman face in society by espousing a simpleton's view of life. And any movie that gives us a terrible, witless catchphrases like, "I am Kenough" deserve their own special place in hell.

I'm looking at you, "Avenger's: Endgame" and , "I love you 3000."

Latest Published Short Story

 I've been keeping quiet about this, patiently awaiting all the edits and formatting, knowing its time was going to come. Now that it has, I can announce my short story publication in the latest print copy of the Horror Zine. Gaze upon yon kick-ass cover:

My story is titled, "The Helpful Dead" and it's the only one you should care about!

Kidding. This issue is chockful of talented writers and wonderful short stories.

The print edition is $14.99 and the Kindle edition is $5.99. I don't care which one you get as long as you read mine first.

Order the magazine by clicking this link.

As always, reviews are welcome and encouraged, even negative ones. 

Tenzin, What Were You Thinking???

 There are times when I really, really hate being proven right. The latest Dalai Lama controversy is one of those times. In case you need a recap, you may click here or read the pull quote below:

The Dalai Lama has apologized for kissing a young boy on the lips and asking him to "suck my tongue" after a video of the incident sparked outrage on social media.

So...Yeah. That happened. 

There could be all sorts of reasons behind what he did. He could be suffering from Dementia, which is likely. He really could have been kidding, which is also likely given his attempts at joking in the past. Or, he could be an old pervert who has lost the ability to keep his perversions to himself. I want to say that's the least likely scenario, but if scandals surrounding holy folk turning out to be sexual predators has taught me anything, it's that the benefit of the doubt is no longer a luxury we can afford. 

As a lapsed Buddhist, I suppose I should be more upset at losing a spiritual teacher than I am. So, why am I not? Frankly, I never much cared for the guy. For me, he's always been a questionable figure who seemed more in love with fame and notoriety than in preaching the Dharma. Even when I saw him in-person, long before I'd formed an opinion of him, old Tenzin gave me a funny vibe.

This was in the early Nineties when Tibetan-style Buddhism was just starting to supplant Zen as the dominant denomination or "school" of the religion in the United States. This was thanks in so small part to actor Richard Gere and the Free Tibet movement. Unlike Zen, (Mahayana Buddhism) the Tibetan school (Vajrayana) had a sexy political cause behind it. Plus, it was a lot prettier than the stripped-down, barebones Zen. It was filled with beautiful colors and lots of pageantry and it had its very own Pop equivalent in the form of a charismatic leader.

I am a Zen Buddhist. I do not subscribe to the overwrought Tibetan version of Buddhism. I find it spiritually empty and far too provincial to be taken seriously. The Book of the Dead, the Bardo, all those rituals including seeking out a reincarnated former lama (teacher) always seemed primitive and silly to me. My belief is that Buddha attained enlightenment through a spontaneous flash of insight during meditation and then chose to guide others to that same place rather than hoard the realization for himself. He didn't choose to become a king.

So, when I observed the Dalai Lama along with other members of my temple, I found him entertaining and charming but something seemed off somehow. In the ensuing years, I came to regard him as an over-exposed media whore, constantly mugging for the camera and seeking validation through fame. Whenever I compared him to the teacher I feel best embodies the Way of the Buddha, Thich Naht Hanh  he came up sorely lacking. Hanh was a humble, mostly solitary figure who did not seek fame and exposure. His actions caused people to notice him, which is how every story about someone following the Buddha begins. 

Buddha never went on a speaking tour and he certainly never made stupid comments about immigrants and women. He never courted celebrities and, here's the most important part, he never placed his focus on a single country and got involved in politics. He also would have never allowed himself to be named the in-effect head of a nation. These were not things an Enlightened One would concern himself with.

Having said all that, however, this incident was quite unforeseen. What was Tenzin thinking? I realize sticking out one's tongue is a show of greetings in Tibetan culture but I doubt telling a kid to suck said tongue is part of the greeting. If anything, the Dalai Lama is an extremely sheltered individual whose every utterance is treated as infallible...until it's not. Then damage control kicks in and nonpologies fly out from the Tibetan PR machine. 

Thich Naht Hanh never issued a single apology for questionable behavior. Neither did Buddha. Hmm. I wonder why old Tenzin has to keep doing it?

Censorship on Demand

Source: https://sites.psu.edu/worldwidewomen/censorship-effects-on-society/

 

Censorship group: We have a list of 200 books we would like removed from the library's shelves immediately!

Library: Well, let's take a look here and...umm, actually we don't have any of those titles in our library.

Censorship group: We're going to go after your collection policy!

Library: But why? We don't have those titles here.

Censorship group: But according to your policy, you could! Someday! Maybe! Possibly!

The above dialogue is not an imagined scenario, it is my way of presenting something that really happened in the United States of 'Murica. Now that the Karens and Chads have lost the masking policies as a form of self-congratulatory faux activism, they're once more focusing on ideas. It's all in the name of the children, of course, because that's how they accomplish their agenda. Everybody who has a different way of thinking is "grooming" the poor innocent kids as if they don't groom them to become pro-censorship, anti-science wackjobs with blatant self-worth issues. 

There is an organization comprised of, surprise-surprise, conservative women who are aggressively trying to do everything they can to make censorship great again. Why do I say "again?" Well, there was a time when it was the norm in this country. In fact, the notion of unfettered access to ideas is relatively new on the United States timeline. The name of this group is, unironically, MomsforLiberty. And in case you're wondering, they have been largely successful in their attempts to keep kids away from scary concepts such as American's actual history and the fact that not everybody is straight.

Operating under the guise of advocating for parental rights, what they're really saying is they want to be able to be part of a society while at the same time not being in any way responsible to that society. It should come as no surprise that these privileged stay-at-homes (mostly) want to have their proverbial cake and eat it, too. They are, after all, used to getting their own way because of who they are. I know, I know. I'm indulging in supposed "identity politics" or whatever rightwing catchphrase is the hip one these days, but facts are still facts no matter how they are labeled.

Like their counterparts in other, similar movements, they proceed from a false premise (See image to the left). The idea that schools, libraries and society at large are somehow attempting to "co-parent" their precious kids is absurd and small-minded. The role of these entities is to provide access to materials to a broad demographic and, if there is teaching occurring, it is for the betterment of the society as a whole. If you don't agree with making your child a well-rounded citizen, homeschool them and keep them in your bubble.

That's not good enough for MomsforLiberty though. Their mission is to wash across the country and effect change in their wake. They see themselves as warriors in the cause of childhood purity and, frankly, they have just enough actual precedent to make themselves seem credible to the misinformed. That's how these groups with their dubious origins become forces to be reckoned with. And make no mistake, they are indeed that.

There is a reason glad-handing opportunists such as Ron DeSantis are so cozy with them. They are a large voting bloc and they vote for anybody who parrots their views. Florida has been their most successful battleground so far but they have chapters in nearly every state. And if the rumors are true and this organization actually requires loyalty oaths and photos of members, we are looking at a totalitarian attempt at policing ideas that will not end with school libraries.

For a list of MomsforLiberty's "accomplishments," click here