Friday, October 28, 2016
Hello, Poland!
I don't know why they find me so fascinating in Poland of all places, but my statistics viewer shows a rather large amount of people viewing my website from there. So...Hello, People of Poland. Thanks for stopping by.
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
On Editorializing
This post was going to be about what a craptacular mound of rubbish is "The Walking Dead," but I'm going to save that one for next time because this incident just took place a mere few hours ago. Well, it didn't start then but it hit its epoch that recently. I want very badly to name names and, in this case, websites, but being the professional I believe myself to be, I'll refrain and simply repost the conversation with a bit of needed context.
The article in question was about box office results for movies released this year and it contained more than a couple side-trips from Fact Town to Opinionberg. A commenter on this particular site's Facebook page decided to disagree with the assessments of some of the films regarding their quality. He was rather smugly advised by the article's author that while his comment was "great," this wasn't an article about opinions on movies. I wrote the following:
That may be what you intended but your opinions of the quality of the films mentioned permeates an article where it wasn't at all called for.
A day passed without any reply so I figured the writer's ego was not sufficiently bruised to warrant snark. I was wrong as the following back-and-forth indicates:
HE: Yup, that's called editorializing.
ME:It sure is.
(Then a few minutes later...) The dictionary definition for those who might be unaware:
Editorialize
"1 to let your opinions show in a piece of writing where you should only be giving facts
Inexperienced reporters are often tempted to editorialize."
(He posted a more extensive definition and accused me of cherry-picking but that comment has since been deleted)
HE: You must be fun at parties (For some reason he didn't delete this incredibly lame and tired rejoinder)
ME: I am fun at parties. I bring liquor for all the minors.
When one editorializes in an informational article, it's generally viewed as a negative or at least an unfortunate stylistic choice. It tends to weaken the overall point and shift the focus unnecessarily to the author. I am aware of the ever thinning divide between fact and opinion thanks to content writing but that's still a thing as they say. Regardless, I'm not here to attack approach, merely pointing out that denying this is an opinion piece is inaccurate. Oops gotta go. The kids need beer!
HE: While I am inclined to agree with you, I do think it's fair to point out that a post about the biggest box office bombs without any editorializing would be a bit dry if it was just cold hard dollars and figures. Also, we're an entertainment blog, not the New York Times. (And never denied that this was an opinion piece, although calling it just that is also inaccurate.). Now please forward us your home address so we can alert the authorities to your serving of alcohol to minors!
ME: LOL!
No one ever referred to his article as strictly an opinion piece, meaning he's either oblivious to what took place or being intentionally obtuse to save face. In other words, he's an Internet Content writer. So, it ended amicably enough and he obviously realized his attempt at expanding the definition to make it serve his purposes backfired and that I was someone who knew what the hell he was talking about
Still, like so many millenials, he had to insist upon his point being valid because everybody gets a trophy.
The article in question was about box office results for movies released this year and it contained more than a couple side-trips from Fact Town to Opinionberg. A commenter on this particular site's Facebook page decided to disagree with the assessments of some of the films regarding their quality. He was rather smugly advised by the article's author that while his comment was "great," this wasn't an article about opinions on movies. I wrote the following:
That may be what you intended but your opinions of the quality of the films mentioned permeates an article where it wasn't at all called for.
A day passed without any reply so I figured the writer's ego was not sufficiently bruised to warrant snark. I was wrong as the following back-and-forth indicates:
HE: Yup, that's called editorializing.
ME:It sure is.
(Then a few minutes later...) The dictionary definition for those who might be unaware:
Editorialize
"1 to let your opinions show in a piece of writing where you should only be giving facts
Inexperienced reporters are often tempted to editorialize."
(He posted a more extensive definition and accused me of cherry-picking but that comment has since been deleted)
HE: You must be fun at parties (For some reason he didn't delete this incredibly lame and tired rejoinder)
ME: I am fun at parties. I bring liquor for all the minors.
When one editorializes in an informational article, it's generally viewed as a negative or at least an unfortunate stylistic choice. It tends to weaken the overall point and shift the focus unnecessarily to the author. I am aware of the ever thinning divide between fact and opinion thanks to content writing but that's still a thing as they say. Regardless, I'm not here to attack approach, merely pointing out that denying this is an opinion piece is inaccurate. Oops gotta go. The kids need beer!
HE: While I am inclined to agree with you, I do think it's fair to point out that a post about the biggest box office bombs without any editorializing would be a bit dry if it was just cold hard dollars and figures. Also, we're an entertainment blog, not the New York Times. (And never denied that this was an opinion piece, although calling it just that is also inaccurate.). Now please forward us your home address so we can alert the authorities to your serving of alcohol to minors!
ME: LOL!
No one ever referred to his article as strictly an opinion piece, meaning he's either oblivious to what took place or being intentionally obtuse to save face. In other words, he's an Internet Content writer. So, it ended amicably enough and he obviously realized his attempt at expanding the definition to make it serve his purposes backfired and that I was someone who knew what the hell he was talking about
Still, like so many millenials, he had to insist upon his point being valid because everybody gets a trophy.
Friday, October 21, 2016
Visual Artist John Skewes: A Class Act
Recently, my short story "Fairy Hunters" was published on the Trigger Warning: Short Fiction With Pictures website with an illustration by John Skewes that I felt perfectly captures the feeling and theme of the story.
Yesterday I received an email from his assistant offering to send me a print of the image. I was beyond impressed by that gesture. It's never happened to me before. I have received free copies of collections in which my work appeared, sometimes with the included artwork, but no artist has ever taken the time to send me a personal print of their work.
It's nice to know there are still people like John out there.
Here is the image:
Yesterday I received an email from his assistant offering to send me a print of the image. I was beyond impressed by that gesture. It's never happened to me before. I have received free copies of collections in which my work appeared, sometimes with the included artwork, but no artist has ever taken the time to send me a personal print of their work.
It's nice to know there are still people like John out there.
Here is the image:
Saturday, October 15, 2016
Beyond Science Fiction Complete Anthology Kindle Edition featuring two Christopher Nadeau Stories!
Before it ceased publication, Beyond Science Fiction was one of two excellent e-zines published by Dayne Edmonson and illustrated by Larry Lonsby Jr. dedicated to featuring actual thought-provoking, non-by-the-numbers genre fiction. The other was Beyond Imagination, which actually wound up becoming a home for more of my work than the former.
Still, this ginormous anthology features two of what I consider my better short stories: "Open Door Policy" and the intensely person "Do-over," of which I am exceedingly proud.
$5.99 is an excellent price for a year's worth of fiction, articles and artwork. And Kindleunlimited users get it for free!
Below is an image of the cover:
Click here to order.
Still, this ginormous anthology features two of what I consider my better short stories: "Open Door Policy" and the intensely person "Do-over," of which I am exceedingly proud.
$5.99 is an excellent price for a year's worth of fiction, articles and artwork. And Kindleunlimited users get it for free!
Below is an image of the cover:
Click here to order.
Monday, October 10, 2016
Sunday, October 9, 2016
What I Did When Faced with a Trump-like Sexist Diatribe from an Employer.
I won’t bother rehashing the content of Donald Trump’s
leaked “hot mic” comments regarding women to a disturbingly complicit Billy
Bush in 2005. Lord knows enough is currently being said about it, including at
least one brilliant parody courtesy of “Saturday Night Live” and Alex Baldwin’s
dead-on impression of the be-wigged Cheeto.
What’s really important to me is the fact that there are people out
there, male and female, who are claiming this is normal “boys will be boys”
banter and that all of us with male plumbing indulge in it.
That, dear reader, is absolute horseshit.
Of course, to hear former Eighties teen heartthrob
Scott Baio tell it, there’s nothing wrong with Trump’s advocacy of sexual
assault and female objectification. After all, “He talks like a guy.” And if
Chachi/Bob Labla can’t tell us how life works, who’s left? Well, me for one. I’m
at least as qualified as a faded TV actor whose constant stabs at relevance
involve latching onto the coattails of a lunatic who’s ushered in more hatred
in his followers than we’ve seen since the heyday of fascism. Since we know how
Baio would have smiled and nodded appreciatively with his hands in his pockets
while Trump discussed women using the “P-word,” we must return again to Billy
Bush.
Bush sat there and giggled and fed into Trump’s braggadocio
for ten minutes when he could have easily put a stop to it. He wasn’t a kid
either. He also wasn’t recording this as part of an expose, since Billy Bush is
about as much of a genuine journalist as Maury Povich. He is either a coward or
he agreed with what he was hearing.
While complaining to my wife about the fact that
Bush is a wus of the highest order, she asked me if I would have stopped Trump’s
offensive comments. When I told I would have, she chuckled lightly and said, “Come
on. Really?”
Then I told her about my own similar experience with
a former boss who was an attorney and a rabid, sexist twerp. He never went as
far as Trump but he started the first time we sat down together discussing
women in a derogatory way. I told him I was uncomfortable with it and that
there were women in the office and I wasn’t interested in having this
conversation, especially in the workplace. He looked at me as if I’d grown a
horn in the middle of my face. Later on when speaking with the female co-worker
and personal friend who had recommended me for the job (it involved writing) he
asked her if I was gay because of what I’d said to him. After all, what kind of
guy would pass up the opportunity to discuss boobs and butts no matter where he
was?
She said, “No. He just doesn’t choose to discuss
women’s body parts at work. He’s a decent MAN.”
Needless to say, he was taken aback. My wife, upon
hearing this, looked at me as if seeing me for the first time, her face bright,
her eyes and mouth equally wide with joy.
She told me I was her hero and, coming from someone who’d been
surrounded by sexism all her life, that meant the world.
You see, I get that objectification happens. And it
happens on both sides. It can be relatively harmless and it should be expected
because we are, at our core, biological entities designed to procreate. But much like with racism, when someone has
the power and wields it in the name of denigrating another human being and sees
it as their earned and born into right, that person is loathsome and beneath
contempt as well as undeserving of even more power.
Monday, October 3, 2016
Latest Short Story Publication.
Just a quick update about "Fairy Hunters," the story that answers the question: "What's the redneck wearing?" After a minor delay, the story has now been published on the Trigger Warning site and I must say I love the artwork that accompanies this strange tale of mine.
Check out here for free!
Check out here for free!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
2 Migraine-inducingly Moronic Posts
No commentary, no attempts to rationalize. Just gaze, if you dare, on the stupid!
-
Well, okay maybe not. But the following questionnaire is a good time waster until I post my next masterstroke and it does give you a glimp...
-
My colleague & friend Nora Cook Smith now available on Amazon! Her book, not her. She's married. http://www.amazon.com/Not-So-Perfec...