Having been incapacitated since the day after Thanksgiving from COVID, I was pleased to wake up this morning to a short story acceptance by Ghostlight Magazine. The editor's letter was most welcome indeed!
Good evening, Chris!
Having been incapacitated since the day after Thanksgiving from COVID, I was pleased to wake up this morning to a short story acceptance by Ghostlight Magazine. The editor's letter was most welcome indeed!
Good evening, Chris!
I've been keeping quiet about this, patiently awaiting all the edits and formatting, knowing its time was going to come. Now that it has, I can announce my short story publication in the latest print copy of the Horror Zine. Gaze upon yon kick-ass cover:
My story is titled, "The Helpful Dead" and it's the only one you should care about!
Kidding. This issue is chockful of talented writers and wonderful short stories.
The print edition is $14.99 and the Kindle edition is $5.99. I don't care which one you get as long as you read mine first.
Order the magazine by clicking this link.
As always, reviews are welcome and encouraged, even negative ones.
My short story, "Floorboards" is currently in the top 25 on Storybilder and you, you lucky person you, can vote for it by clicking this here hyperlink!
Thanks in Advance!
| "Why pay for movies when you can pay me?" |
Especially those of us who dare write fiction.
Recently, I saw a video clip of an Evangelical preacher admonishing people for watching horror movies. His bone of contention was that the films somehow convince us that the entities they feature are more powerful than they actually are when all one really needs is Christian faith to essentially stomp these beings into the ground for Jesus. This preacher went on to decry all horror films as an attempt to deceive people from the truth of the Gospel. That's all well and good. He can believe whatever he wants, but what he can't do is speak as an authority on something he clearly knows nothing about.
This certainly wasn't the first time a preacher arrogantly proclaimed his knowledge about the so-called "secular world" and it sadly isn't anywhere near to being the last. It's yet another in a long line of misconceptions uttered by someone who entire existence is informed by magical thinking. It's a fascinating contradiction to be both literal-minded and entirely lacking in logic, but when one's false sense of righteousness is backed up by the bubble they operate within, it is unavoidable.
| "We're lookin' for the guy that called us weak and defeated." |
Most importantly, he misunderstands (whether intentionally or unintentionally) the entire point of horror, which is to provide much-needed catharsis for the audience watching it. Fear is only a bad thing if it's given more power than it deserves. By proclaiming all fictional horror part of some greater conspiracy to perpetrate a lie about Christian-centric demons, he stands revealed as little more than a peddler of ignorance desperately trying to understand a word that makes little sense to him otherwise. The sad part is there are millions of Americans are not only willing but also happy to follow along.
I can't think of anything more horrifying that that.
The Horror Zine has once again won several categories in the Critters annual poll. I am proud to have had my work published by them more than once over the years and look forward to working with them in the near future.
It is yet another furry horror collection, a sub-genre whose existence I find endlessly fascinating and sometimes downright terrifying. I'm still trying to fully wrap my brain around the concept as well as the sub-culture whose existence doesn't baffle as much as the fact that there have now been more than one furry horror anthology and apparently more on the horizon.
However, this time around at least, it isn't the reality of furries that has drawn my attention. It's the sentence below:
BIPOC Authors, Queer Authors, Disabled Authors, Authors who are currently or former Sex Workers are strongly encouraged to submit.
Forgive my Midwestern ignorance, but when exactly did Sex Workers fall under the category of marginalized minority? I'm not saying the perspectives of Sex Workers both former and current aren't valid or even something that needs to be seen. On the contrary, there is a wealth of experience and outlook there that is a potential literary goldmine. I'm also no prude when it comes to, ummm, that thing that...men and woman do when it's dark and never speak of once all the sinning is over in 30 seconds.
So, as someone who has been on the other side of the editorial wall accepting submissions and desperately hoping for something unique and different, I get wanting fresh perspectives. I even commend whoever thought of including Sex Workers as a valid fiction-writing group. What I don't get, however, is including them in a long sentence that mentions marginalized people who have faced discrimination. Much like the logical assertion that there is no such thing as a "Blue Life" because it's a career, can the same not be said for Sex Workers? Yes, many of them are not working willingly or even because they always wanted to work in the skin trade, but still...it's not a race or a gender or sexual preference.
If we muddle the definitions of things to suit our own points of view, we risk rendering the very real issues in society meaningless.
That said, I look forward to seeing Sex Workers do more!
(That really didn't come out right, did it?)
If you've ever met one of those people who disdain every movie they see by claiming there wasn't enough character development, you've probably also suspected that they didn't really know what that phrase meant. Similarly, whenever someone uses buzzwords such as, "Overwritten," or "longish," one wonders if the reviewer is more in love with their ability to sound knowledgeable and too hip for the room. It's difficult to say. We weren't all taught to give reasons for our opinions, nor were we all taught to eschew buzzwords when we do. So, perhaps there's little point in trying to understand the mindset of a man whose reaction to 80% of an anthology was so hostile.
I defy anyone to read the opening paragraph of Perceptive's review and not either chuckle or shake their head. Not to review the review, but come on! Phrases such as, " ...nod sagely while procrastinating about increasing paranoia among the hoi-polloi, in these days of connectivity and terrorism" are clearly meant to be taken seriously but is that even possible? It isn't for me but your mileage may vary.
My short story "Arrival" happens to be one of my favorite stories I've ever written. It is the sequel to "Emergence," which appeared in "Monster Hunter Legends Both Barrels" also published by Emby Press. That doesn't mean I expect everyone else to love it. It's a rather specific type of story, one that combines elements of classic comic books, horror and religious fanaticism. There's no reason to assume Mr. P. Reader would find that even remotely fascinating. I would love to know why he considered it crap, however, as I'll bet many of the other authors whose works were dismissed in like fashion would also.
Alas, there are no answers to be found in this case. P.R. either didn't feel the need to elaborate or that his simplistic reactions spoke volumes. I will close by adding this one nugget of hoped-for wisdom:
Reviews such as these help no one. They serve no one. They say nothing except "Lookit me being all edgy and stuff." No writer learns from the experience in a way that either helps them grow and improve and, in fact, some probably shrink away from the writing for publication world, discouraged and convinced that their Imposter Syndrome was the real thing. And while I know this is a tough field and that people who can't take harsh criticism need not apply, I also feel strongly that irresponsible reviews such as the one in this post are detrimental and destructive to the overall discourse.
So in spite of myself, I will review P. Reader's review with my own one-word choice: Idiotic.
Plot: The
zombie apocalypse is over. The humans have won. Life is back to normal. And Rip
is bored as hell. It's not much of a life sitting in a call center in the poor
town of Spanish Shanty, Florida, answering emails like a drone and listening to
customer complaints.
Rip was ruler of a tiny kingdom in the Lazy River
waterpark, killing zombies by day and making passionate love at night. He
misses the danger, the camaraderie, and the blistering love he once knew. He
longs to feel Santana—his trusty machet—in his hand, and Davia—the fiercest
woman alive—in his arms once again. He can still picture it—life on the razor's
edge—and he would do anything to get that feeling back. But what if Rip could
get it back?
I am intrigued by the novel pictured and described above,
the advertisement for which I received from the SFBC in an email. I love
the idea of a post-POST-Apocalyptic tale where all the so-called "cool
stuff" has already taken place. And that call center employee angle?
Inspired as all get-out! The very concept swells to bursting with the cynicism
of a Christopher Nadeau tale! If only I had thought of something like this!
Oh, wait.
In a now out of print edition of Ghostlight Magazine
(Summer 2011 to be precise) my short story "Cubicle Dwellers" was
published. The plot concerned a man who had spent the so-called zombie
apocalypse in a mental institution, too doped up to realize the world was
falling apart outside his room. Once the meds wear off, he awakens to an
orderly who is no longer alive but still insists on doing his job...badly, of
course. Our hero escapes with his life only to find out the world has changed
as the dead have risen and...gone back to work. What else can he do except the
same thing? Two guesses who the real zombies are.
I've only written two zombie stories and that was the
one that was more open about my disdain for the sub-genre. The other story was
a much more serious historical tale that dealt with racism and the
self-entitlement of the ruling class. Oh, and cannibalism because why not?
Think of it as an homage to the Donner Party, or at least the myth surrounding
them.
I'm not saying Adams' novel is like mine beyond the basic
idea of the mundane aftermath of a supposedly extraordinary event. What I am
saying is I wasn't seeing fiction like this nine years ago when I received
rejection after rejection for not writing in a tiny box that was the only thing
most magazine and anthology publishers seemed interested in putting out. Now
that winking self-awareness is all the rage, books like this are flooding the
market.
Don't get me wrong. It's a good thing. Very good. The
best. You've never seen a better thing. Someone said to me, "Sir, do you
think this good thing is very good?"
Trumpian self-promotion aside, I am glad to see a
long-needed approach to these types of stories appearing. I just want you to
know it didn't happen in a vacuum and that some of us were writing them when
the close-mindedness of those with the power to say yes or no acted as a
barrier.
Now, let's go read "Apocalypse Yesterday" with
its admittedly heavy-handed title and in the meantime I'm going to take another
look at "Cubicle Dwellers" and think long and hard about what type of
retooling it deserves~