Friday, September 30, 2022
Why "Andor" is Basically Terrible
Tuesday, September 13, 2022
Fanaticism at War with Creativity (and it's winning)
It's obvious now in the U.S. that we got used to thinking all the censorship and persecution was in the past. Movies are made about it and tons of books have been written on the subject. Most of these presumed an evolved, more aware society looking back on a terrible time with the perspective of those who have learned "the lesson" and moved forward.
It turns out the religious fanatics were quietly getting themselves into positions where they could enact sweeping censorship across the entire nation, the South in particular. This is not an altogether surprising event to me. I have been tracking the Religious Right's mostly successful strategy since the 1990s. Once they realized Ronald Reagan was not the Evangelical-friendly president they'd been hoping for, they set their sites on more realistic targets. Local school boards, City Councils, small-town mayoral elections and even courtrooms were slowly infiltrated by them until the time came for them to begin enacting their agenda for social control in the name of spiritual salvation.
And they were really, really good at it too.
"Questionable" books began to be challenged in school libraries. Laws were passed that would never have withstood the light of day a mere decade before. Harmful deprogramming techniques aimed at gays gained popularity in certain circles and there was a bizarre shift from blaming Jews for the crucifixion of Jesus to hailing them as wonderful because in their view, these people needed to be slaughtered in order to bring on those wonderful End Times. But that's okay because they will be given a second chance to accept Christ as the messiah and everybody will live happily ever after for a thousand years because ancient people couldn't conceive of a number larger than that.
But let's take a quick step back. This is a highly motivated, resentful and frighteningly large group of Americans who have felt marginalized and disrespected for generations. And, to be fair, they kind of were. Most mainstream so-called "secular" Americans saw them as little more than a pack of ignorant hayseeds, members of a vocal minority whose predilection for following flawed, charismatic nutjobs had descended into self-parody. And, to be fair, they kind of had.
So, where did that leave us? Simply put, with a two-sided coin sitting on its side in the middle of a field of general apathy. On one side of that coin sits a large, angry, delusional minority of religious zealots whose entire lives have been spent in a veritable echo chamber of self-righteousness and magical thinking. On the other sits their opposite extreme, far left social engineers with an alarming level of self-interest pushing various agendas with no real awareness of what they are up against. Meanwhile, on that field of apathy, we have small groups of people just starting to open their eyes and realize what's happening while they watch their streaming shows and stupidly put the names of their children on signs outside their houses complete with the names of their schools as celebration.
The demands for censorship we are seeing are primarily but by no means exclusively coming from the Right. The difference is the Right's agenda is far more organized because Right-wingers tend to think alike whereas one of the strengths and weaknesses of Left-wingers is their lack of constant, mindless agreement with one another. But where exactly are these calls for book banning coming from and who is initiating them? You might be surprised by the answer:
Surprised? You probably are. Who would have expected school and library boards to issue more challenges than political and religious groups? Who expected the number of elected officials doing it to be lower than the percentage of librarians and teachers? The second column tracks with conventional wisdom, however, as does the third one. It is interesting to note how much importance is placed on the written word vs. other types of media. No matter what, words on a page (or a screen) still cause more discomfort than images and songs. The reason for that should be obvious. Their entire worldview is based on the written words in a book they believe is the only one anybody needs because all of the answers are found in its pages.
Here's the part so many non-believers and rationally minded believers do not get about these people. They indulge in constant magical thinking. In their minds, all fiction is based on belief, most of it running contrary to theirs. They are a bizarre combination of irrationality and literal-mindedness that makes it nearly impossible for them to grasp metaphor and subtlety, let alone allegorical social commentary. In fact, those words are meaningless to them because their over-simplified worldview is based on the most basic concept of good vs. evil resulting in simplistic reward or punishment. There is no nuance there.
This is why when these groups are challenged to present one specific example of why they consider a book unacceptable, they either cannot do it or can't be bothered to even try. What's the point in offering specifics when the entire thing is based on Satanic appeasement? Trust me, when they use the word "Worldly," it's not a positive thing. The actual definition of that word is someone who is well-rounded and educated, but they use it to mean someone who is by default in league with the devil because they are "of the world." The world is evil because of humanity's fall from Grace, despite the efforts of Jesus in the New Testament to usher in an Age of Grace.
It is this very contradictory nature that makes it impossible to reason with book banners who are doing it for religious reasons. Reason is just another way of moving away from God in their estimation. Science is the devil's religion, at least that's what a similar-minded friend once said to me in a matter-of-fact tone of voice. Funnily enough, following the tiny bit of logic contained in that mentality, one would think politics would be the devil's playground. Yet Evangelicals have been infiltrating local government for decades so they could enact their peculiar brand of American Christianity. Library boards, school boards and city councils were just the beginning. They are well beyond that now and their lack of willingness to engage in the realm of ideas is slowly affecting our lives in ways that are becoming more and more apparent.
(If you wish to join the fight against library censorship, contact these fines folks and make your voices heard)
Wednesday, August 17, 2022
Pondering my Novel
Funnily enough, the COVID pandemic is only mentioned sparingly in the novel and never by name. I felt keeping it more abstract and ominous worked better as a plot device. Besides, the main protagonist is from the year 2012, so he really has no idea what's coming in 2020. This is a novel packed with ideas and images and connections that bridge time, space and reality itself. Making it about COVID would defeat the purpose and run the risk of becoming preachy. This is not a preachy book. It doesn't slow down long enough to preach.
It does, however, deal with themes that are sure to make some people uncomfortable. It also offers answers that many would resoundingly reject for fear of feeling as if their entire lives were pointless. Others will feel emboldened by the purposefulness they find in the narrative.
Without going too deeply into the story itself, here is a list of themes I have noticed as I close in on the novel's intentionally
- Selfishness
- Greed
- Lack of Empathy
- Self-righteousness
- Corporate dominance
- The nature of creation
- Cult-like mentalities
- Doppelgangers
- Regret
- Redemption
- Helplessness
- Courage
- Dream logic
- The soul-crushing experience of retail work
- The inherent shallowness of thoughts and prayers
- Revolution
- The death of objective thought
Tuesday, July 12, 2022
My Emmy Picks for 2022
Below is a list of the nominees for Emmy Awards for 2022. I have highlighted my choice for each section. Keep in mind, some of my selections are based on having only seen that series or that actor and none of the others.
Outstanding Drama Series
Better Call Saul
Euphoria
Ozark
Severance
Squid Game
Stranger Things
Succession
YellowjacketsOutstanding Comedy Series
Abbot Elementary
Barry- A very close second but it's not really a comedy.
Curb Your Enthusiasm
Hacks
The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
Only Murders In The Building
Ted Lasso
What We Do in the ShadowsOutstanding Limited Or Anthology Series
Dopesick
The Dropout
Inventing Anna
Pam & Tommy
The White LotusOutstanding Lead Actor In A Drama Series
Brian Cox — Succession
Lee Jung-jae — Squid Game
Bob Odenkirk — Better Call Saul
Adam Scott — Severance
Jeremy Strong — SuccessionOutstanding Lead Actor In A Comedy Series
Donald Glover — Atlanta
Bill Hader — Barry
Nicholas Holt — The Great
Steve Martin — Only Murders In The Building
Martin Short — Only Murders In The Building
Jason Sudeikis — Ted LassoOutstanding Lead Actress In A Comedy Series
Rachel Brosnahan — The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
Quinta Brunson — Abbott Elementary
Kaley Cuoco — The Flight Attendant
Elle Fanning — The Great
Issa Rae — Insecure
Jean Smart — HacksOutstanding Supporting Actor In A Drama Series
Nicholas Braun — Succession
Billy Crudup — The Morning Show
Kieran Culkin — Succession
Park Hae-soo — Squid Game
Matthew Macfadyen — Succession
John Turturro — Severance
Christopher Walken — Severance
Oh Yeong-su — Squid GameOutstanding Supporting Actor In A Comedy Series
Anthony Carrigan — Barry
Brett Goldstein — Ted Lasso
Toheeb Jimoh — Ted Lasso
Nick Mohammed — Ted Lasso
Tony Shalhoub — The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
Tyler James Williams — Abbott Elementary
Henry Winkler — Barry
Bowen Yang — Saturday Night LiveOutstanding Supporting Actress In A Drama Series
Patricia Arquette — Severance
Julia Garner — Ozark
Jung Ho-yeon — Squid Game
Christina Ricci — Yellowjackets
Rhea Seehorn — Better Call Saul
J. Smith-Cameron — Succession
Sarah Snook — Succession
Sydney Sweeney — EuphoriaOutstanding Supporting Actress In A Comedy Series
Alex Borstein — The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
Hannah Einbinder — Hacks
Janelle James — Abbott Elementary
Kate McKinnon — Saturday Night Live
Sarah Niles — Ted Lasso
Sheryl Lee Ralph — Abbott Elementary
Juno Temple — Ted Lasso
Hannah Waddingham — Ted LassoOutstanding Variety Talk Series
The Daily Show With Trevor Noah
Jimmy Kimmel Live!
Last Week Tonight With John Oliver
Late Night With Seth Meyers
The Late Show With Stephen ColbertOutstanding Documentary Or Nonfiction Series
The Andy Warhol Diaries
The Beatles: Get Back
jeen-yuhs: A Kanye Trilogy
100 Foot Wave
We Need To Talk About Cosby
My Next Guest Needs No Introduction With David Letterman
The Problem With Jon Stewart
Stanley Tucci: Searching For Italy
ViceReality Series (Structured)
Antiques Roadshow
Fixer Upper: Welcome Home
Love Is Blind
Queer Eye
Shark TankAnimated Series
Arcane
Bob’s Burgers
Rick And Morty
The Simpsons
What If…?Short Form (Animated)
The Boys Presents: Diabolical
Love, Death + Robots
Robot Chicken
Star Wars: Visions
When Billie Met LisaCategories where I hadn't seen or heard of the nominees were omitted. Feel free to disagree with me in the comments.
Tuesday, May 31, 2022
Monday, May 16, 2022
Sticktoitiveness
This has been me for many, many years. Obviously I'm not alone or nobody would have created this meme. Okay, maybe I would have, but nobody else.
This year I resolved to begin and complete my novel "2012/2021" and I am on track to see do. All other ideas and short stories have been set aside and this book is literally the only fiction I have worked on since the year began.
I fully expect to be finished with the first draft by no later than mid-June.
The writing of "2012/2021" has been incredibly rewarding, perhaps the most rewarding writing experience I have ever had. It is the novel I've always felt I had in me but was not yet able to capture it the way I wanted. The pandemic changed that.
So, if anyone still reads this blog and was wondering why I don't post as often as I used to, that's the reason.
Tuesday, April 26, 2022
Some Chapter Titles from my Work in Progress "2012/2021"
Thursday, March 10, 2022
Book Banning & the Death of Discomfort
Last month Young Adult Fiction author Bill Konigsberg wrote what is perhaps the best written, most comprehensive refutation of book banning I have seen. It was in reference to his novel, "The Bridge" (pictured to the left) which deals with teenage suicide. In his letter, Konigsberg tries to speak rationally to irrational people in a tragically pointless appeal to their intellects. If there have been any responses from the "concerned parents" who wish to remove his work from school libraries, I haven't seen it.
It's doubtful they will engage him in a battle of wits when they are so poorly equipped. Book banners are not thinkers, they are reactors. They allow emotion and beliefs of a mostly archaic nature to guide their choices. There's also an element of tribalism in their decision-making, whether it be racial or religious in nature. It's often both. These are people who lack the ability to think beyond themselves, the pinnacle of provinciality.
Most often, the parents demanding book removals from school libraries see the world in a severely limited way. It is a form of magical thinking that frames all issues into an odd combination of advocacy and promotion. Because so many of them operate based on nothing but faith, they are unable to grasp the concept of presenting ideas just for discussion or as a challenge to preconceived notions. This is threatening to the magical thinker because an alternate view only exists to lure them away from the absolute certainty of the system they follow. For example, Yoga cannot be positive in its purest form because it has a spiritual component. That automatically means there is evil encoded in its rituals and one must be on guard against its conniving ways. For the magical thinker, the only good alternate idea is one that has been co-opted by their belief system.
Take a look at karate if you don't believe me. I'll even make it easy for you. Take a look at this website. Read their bullshit spin job on the history of martial arts where they try to justify their outright theft or cultural appropriation by citing other cultures with martial arts traditions from the ancient world that were not Asian in origin. They weren't Christian either but who needs details to spoil a good lie? They even somehow include creationism and the absurd claim that Earth is 6,000 years old as a method for whitewashing their use of a non-Christian fighting art. If they have concerns over the "strong occult powers entrenched in Asian practice," why don't they practice one of the other arts they mention from Egypt and Pakistan?
Quick answer: They don't need to. They already control the narrative.
But they don't control the narrative of books like "The Bridge" or Art Spiegelman's "Maus," another title these tireless parental crusaders have gone after because it makes their sensibilities all squirmy. The latter is an even more egregious example of book banning. These close-minded individuals took this man's father's life experience during the Holocaust and got rid of it because there is foul language and some nudity. One parent even accused the school library of "promoting" these things by carrying the book. Once more we return to magical thinking, where no idea is up for discussion because it only exists to disrespect the Absolute Truth. Instead of talking about these elements of a story and placing them in proper context, i.e. the supposed "sexual explicit behavior" in Konigsberg's book of which there is none. I read it.
I read "Maus" too. So I can tell you without fear of contradiction that only a person with little to no ability to use basic cognition would be offended by it or even want to prevent their teenaged child from reading it.
Despite my obvious disdain for the realm of dogmatic reactionary claptrap coming from the majority of these parent watchdogs, there is another aspect to all of this that I feel is being either ignored or going unnoticed.
Much of what gets read these days is fluff. It's been that way for decades, especially in the mainstream Fiction world. Sadly, there are two celebrities we can thank for that. Oprah started it with her book club and Reese Witherspoon has continued it with hers. Both of these women, neither of them authors of fiction, do what most non-experts do when it comes to selecting titles for their respective clubs. They choose what they like based on how the books make them feel. Sometimes there's a challenge embedded in the stories, but somehow things usually work out favorably by the end. Discomfort becomes a temporary thing, the method by which the reader can be transported into a tale that will ultimately make them feel good about themselves and the choices they have made in life.
That is, of course, a generalization. I know Oprah recommended books such as "The Bluest Eye" by Toni Morrison which, by no means, ends in a mostly positive place. And I'm not even referring to the book clubs these two famous actors endorse as trash peddlers. There are plenty of quality works on their lists. But the readership is not looking for stories that pull them too far out of their comfort zones. And if adults feel this way, they naturally assume they must protect children from the opposite as well.
Discomfort is important. Vonnegut's "Slaughterhouse Five" wasn't written so that we could applaud the bombing of Dresden. He was there. He lived it. And just like Spiegelman, he wanted to share that part of himself with the world in an attempt to help his fellow humans understand what we are capable of and why we must expose ourselves to things that don't make us feel good about ourselves. Not all reading is for entertainment. I would expect even the least educated parents out there to know that titles in a school library are there because students can learn from them.
Even when they have naughty words and side-boob and make us wonder if our beliefs suck and need to be changed.
Tuesday, February 1, 2022
Quote of the Month
It's only the first but this lengthy one has already earned it spot the Quote of the Month! Written as a comment on an article asking why so many "Latinx" TV series get cancelled, this imagined dialogue was one of the responses:
Monday, January 31, 2022
Quote of the Month
The Quote of the Month comes on the very last day of January from a Facebook poster responding to mental furball Candace Owens' latest idiotic comment (below):
The quote follows:
"Why do conspiracy theorists question everything but the conspiracy theory?"
Friday, January 28, 2022
CLOSING THE DOOR ON SHERRY SHRINER
On July 19, 2010 I posted what I thought was a humorous piece on a bizarre group of people on Facebook whose belief system was so far out there, I thought it was satire. That post, which you can read by clicking here, began a several years' long fascination on my part with this charisma-free individual and her increasingly demented claims.
Her followers did not find me amusing, as evidenced by the post above, and soon the novelty wore off and I decided to look into their leader. What I found was a hodgepodge of conspiracy theories with roots stretching back to anti-Semitic beliefs, Hollywood-inspired tales of aliens, and astoundingly odd misreading of the Christian Bible. Despite what was already enough to convince me the woman was mentally unbalanced, it was when I heard her speak that I knew for sure she was dangerous.
I listened to several of her podcasts and even suffered through one of her rambling, schizophrenic "books" because I just couldn't believe there were other people taking her seriously. Eventually, I started writing about her and her cult of adherents. I published the articles on Suite101 with the intention of trying to figure out if Shriner was a con artist or a true lunatic. I reached the conclusion that she was somehow, paradoxically, both. There really is such a thing as believing one's own bullshit, and no one excelled at it the way Sherry Shriner did.
After a while, it stopped being fun. People enjoyed the articles well enough, but they seemed to fall into one of two camps: The Dismissives, who felt Shriner deserved no attention at all, and the Popcorn Munchers, who looked forward to a good laugh. I was neither. There was something dangerous about this mush-mouthed individual, something dark and horrifying. I had gone from intense amusement at the outset to fascination to finally wariness.
While I looked in on Shriner's antics from time to time over the next decade, I didn't feel the need to write about her. Others were already doing that, some of whom were doing a good job. Still others were just out there as she, calling her a false prophet instead of dangerously mentally ill. Some even accused her of being the shapeshifting reptilian alien she labeled others as being. I was not the first person to write about her, but it seemed like most others were more concerned in proving she was wrong in favor of their own ideologies. Clearly a war was being waged between extremists in the world of self-righteous zealots.
The years passed and more dangerous paranoids took the stage, most notably Alex Jones. The QAnon movement seemed to encompass all ludicrous theories in a similar way to Shriner but with even more frightening effectiveness. Shriner was becoming a dinosaur in an era where her teachings were little more than an Internet footnote. Her voice had receded into the background of a rising cacophony of illogical, truth-bending, reality-denying imbeciles all believing their uninformed opinions to be equal to proven fact. I almost longed for the "charm" of her silly claims and assertions. Then I found out somebody was killed because of her and everything changed.
Actually, let's take a step back to 2012, not long after I had stopped paying much attention to Shriner and her wacked out cadre of supposed Orgone Warriors. Somehow, a story did not catch my notice that year, perhaps because it was a pivotal year of change for me. Apparently, a young woman from my home state who actually didn't live all that far from me committed suicide in a nearby park so she could be reborn as a spirit warrior in Shriner's so-called cause. Her name was Kelly Pingilley and she was, by all accounts, most likely an undiagnosed delusional schizophrenic who desperately wanted to understand the voices and urges in her head. Shriner preyed on people like her.
An event I did know about was the suicide and possible murder of former Shriner acolyte Steve Mineo in 2017. Mineo supposedly asked his girlfriend to shoot him in the head because he couldn't handle all of the online harassments from Shriner's followers coupled with his inability to expose her as a fraud. The details of the shooting are bizarre and covered in length on the Vice docu-series "The Devil You Know." But you can read a more detailed account here.
Shriner immediately went into self-preservation mode, blaming the girlfriend by branding her a vampire and a demon and shapeshifter and a clone and whatever else dropped out of her evil ass. She blamed NATO for Mineo's death, which she claimed was part of a psyop being waged against her because of her dangerous status as God's holy messenger.
First of all...NATO??? Secondly, how could Mineo's girlfriend be all of those things at the same time? She even used doctored photos to make it seem as if the woman had been replaced with an older-looking clone.
Who knows what other horrific things she caused during her time online? She was an unrepentant opportunist to whom human life clearly meant very little. Her "ministry" was her source of income and she milked it for all it was worth.
Shriner died of a heart attack on January 28th, 2021, most likely caused by her reported chain-smoking problem. One would think a movement so strongly identified with its originator would die off with that person gone. One would be wrong. The Facebook page devoted to Shriner continues under her daughter's moderation and many claim Sherry wasn't killed at all. One person even wrote that she was "disappeared" by NATO and will re-emerge brainwashed, refuting everything she taught. All I could write back was, "Now THAT'S how you keep a swindle going!"
That is most likely my final word on the subject of Sherry Shriner, warbley-voiced, poorly spoken, hostile and undeniably insane self-appointed Messenger of the Most High and purveyor of every batshit crazy conspiracy theory ever devised. May she fade into the background of collective memory until she is little more than footnote.
-
Well, okay maybe not. But the following questionnaire is a good time waster until I post my next masterstroke and it does give you a glimp...
-
I was first introduced to Kurt Vonnegut in a Literature class. I’d just recently taken a creative writing class and was feeling all read out...



