Wednesday, August 17, 2022

Pondering my Novel

 As I am now 6,000-8,000 words away from finishing my novel, "2012/2021" I have begun noticing the themes that I wasn't necessarily consciously aware of until I'd been working on it for several months. My intent was always twofold: To write my own Vonnegut-type of novel and to write the novel I wish I'd written when I published "Dreamers at Infinity's Core." And all it took was a global pandemic, idiots who thought it was fake despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, and unbelievable amounts of selfishness and self-entitlement.

Funnily enough, the COVID pandemic is only mentioned sparingly in the novel and never by name. I felt keeping it more abstract and ominous worked better as a plot device. Besides, the main protagonist is from the year 2012, so he really has no idea what's coming in 2020. This is a novel packed with ideas and images and connections that bridge time, space and reality itself. Making it about COVID would defeat the purpose and run the risk of becoming preachy. This is not a preachy book. It doesn't slow down long enough to preach.

It does, however, deal with themes that are sure to make some people uncomfortable. It also offers answers that many would resoundingly reject for fear of feeling as if their entire lives were pointless. Others will feel emboldened by the purposefulness they find in the narrative.

Without going too deeply into the story itself, here is a list of themes I have noticed as I close in on the novel's intentionally 


  • Selfishness
  • Greed
  • Lack of Empathy
  • Self-righteousness
  • Corporate dominance
  • The nature of creation
  • Cult-like mentalities
  • Doppelgangers
  • Regret
  • Redemption
  • Helplessness
  • Courage
  • Dream logic
  • The soul-crushing experience of retail work
  • The inherent shallowness of thoughts and prayers
  • Revolution
  • The death of objective thought

And that's just off the top of my head! "2012/2021" isn't so much a story as an unraveling that feeds on itself like my own mind.

I can't wait to see it get rejected over and over!

Tuesday, July 12, 2022

My Emmy Picks for 2022

 Below is a list of the nominees for Emmy Awards for 2022. I have highlighted my choice for each section. Keep in mind, some of my selections are based on having only seen that series or that actor and none of the others.

  • Outstanding Drama Series

    Better Call Saul
    Euphoria
    Ozark
    Severance
    Squid Game
    Stranger Things
    Succession
    Yellowjackets

  • Outstanding Comedy Series

    Abbot Elementary
    Barry- A very close second but it's not really a comedy.
    Curb Your Enthusiasm
    Hacks
    The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
    Only Murders In The Building
    Ted Lasso
    What We Do in the Shadows

  • Outstanding Limited Or Anthology Series

    Dopesick
    The Dropout
    Inventing Anna
    Pam & Tommy
    The White Lotus

  • Outstanding Lead Actor In A Drama Series

    Brian Cox — Succession
    Lee Jung-jae — Squid Game
    Bob Odenkirk — Better Call Saul
    Adam Scott — Severance
    Jeremy Strong — Succession

  • Outstanding Lead Actor In A Comedy Series

    Donald Glover — Atlanta
    Bill Hader — Barry
    Nicholas Holt — The Great
    Steve Martin — Only Murders In The Building
    Martin Short — Only Murders In The Building
    Jason Sudeikis — Ted Lasso

  • Outstanding Lead Actress In A Comedy Series

    Rachel Brosnahan — The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
    Quinta Brunson — Abbott Elementary
    Kaley Cuoco — The Flight Attendant
    Elle Fanning — The Great
    Issa Rae — Insecure
    Jean Smart — Hacks

  • Outstanding Supporting Actor In A Drama Series

    Nicholas Braun — Succession
    Billy Crudup — The Morning Show
    Kieran Culkin — Succession
    Park Hae-soo — Squid Game
    Matthew Macfadyen — Succession
    John Turturro — Severance
    Christopher Walken — Severance
    Oh Yeong-su — Squid Game

  • Outstanding Supporting Actor In A Comedy Series

    Anthony Carrigan — Barry
    Brett Goldstein — Ted Lasso
    Toheeb Jimoh — Ted Lasso
    Nick Mohammed — Ted Lasso
    Tony Shalhoub — The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
    Tyler James Williams — Abbott Elementary
    Henry Winkler — Barry
    Bowen Yang — Saturday Night Live

  • Outstanding Supporting Actress In A Drama Series

    Patricia Arquette — Severance
    Julia Garner — Ozark
    Jung Ho-yeon — Squid Game
    Christina Ricci — Yellowjackets
    Rhea Seehorn — Better Call Saul
    J. Smith-Cameron — Succession
    Sarah Snook — Succession
    Sydney Sweeney — Euphoria

  • Outstanding Supporting Actress In A Comedy Series

    Alex Borstein — The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
    Hannah Einbinder — Hacks
    Janelle James — Abbott Elementary
    Kate McKinnon — Saturday Night Live
    Sarah Niles — Ted Lasso
    Sheryl Lee Ralph — Abbott Elementary
    Juno Temple — Ted Lasso
    Hannah Waddingham — Ted Lasso

  • Outstanding Variety Talk Series

    The Daily Show With Trevor Noah
    Jimmy Kimmel Live!
    Last Week Tonight With John Oliver
    Late Night With Seth Meyers
    The Late Show With Stephen Colbert

  • Outstanding Documentary Or Nonfiction Series

    The Andy Warhol Diaries
    The Beatles: Get Back
    jeen-yuhs: A Kanye Trilogy
    100 Foot Wave
    We Need To Talk About Cosby
    My Next Guest Needs No Introduction With David Letterman
    The Problem With Jon Stewart
    Stanley Tucci: Searching For Italy
    Vice

  • Reality Series (Structured)

    Antiques Roadshow
    Fixer Upper: Welcome Home
    Love Is Blind
    Queer Eye
    Shark Tank

  • Animated Series

    Arcane
    Bob’s Burgers
    Rick And Morty
    The Simpsons
    What If…?

  • Short Form (Animated)

    The Boys Presents: Diabolical
    Love, Death + Robots
    Robot Chicken
    Star Wars: Visions
    When Billie Met Lisa

  • Categories where I hadn't seen or heard of the nominees were omitted. Feel free to disagree with me in the comments.

Monday, May 16, 2022

Sticktoitiveness

 

This has been me for many, many years. Obviously I'm not alone or nobody would have created this meme. Okay, maybe I would have, but nobody else.

This year I resolved to begin and complete my novel "2012/2021" and I am on track to see do. All other ideas and short stories have been set aside and this book is literally the only fiction I have worked on since the year began. 

I fully expect to be finished with the first draft by no later than mid-June.

The writing of "2012/2021" has been incredibly rewarding, perhaps the most rewarding writing experience I have ever had. It is the novel I've always felt I had in me but was not yet able to capture it the way I wanted. The pandemic changed that. 

So, if anyone still reads this blog and was wondering why I don't post as often as I used to, that's the reason. 

Tuesday, April 26, 2022

Some Chapter Titles from my Work in Progress "2012/2021"

 

Chapter One: Those Wacky Mayans

Chapter 4: Displacement, Dat Placement or de udder Placement

Chapter 5: From Better Best to Sweater Vest

Chapter 6: Ain’t Nobody Got Time for DAT

Chapter 8: Opinions are Like Maskholes...

Chapter 11: Memories & Other Things That Never Happened

Chapter 13: At the End of the World Resides Myrtle

Chapter 15: Absolute Truth Ain’t Always Absolute Proof

Chapter 16: Symmetry at the Cemetery

Chapter 20: What are you doing, Daves?

Chapter 22: A Tale of Two Psychos



As you can see, I've been rather busy. Nearly 60,000 words as of this writing and I couldn't be having a better time. This is the novel I've been wanting to write for years without actually knowing it and I hope, when the time comes, it will be well-received and given a chance to be read by others.


Thursday, March 10, 2022

Book Banning & the Death of Discomfort

 


Last month Young Adult Fiction author Bill Konigsberg wrote what is perhaps the best written, most comprehensive refutation of book banning I have seen. It was in reference to his novel, "The Bridge" (pictured to the left) which deals with teenage suicide. In his letter, Konigsberg tries to speak rationally to irrational people in a tragically pointless appeal to their intellects. If there have been any responses from the "concerned parents" who wish to remove his work from school libraries, I haven't seen it. 

It's doubtful they will engage him in a battle of wits when they are so poorly equipped. Book banners are not thinkers, they are reactors. They allow emotion and beliefs of a mostly archaic nature to guide their choices. There's also an element of tribalism in their decision-making, whether it be racial or religious in nature. It's often both. These are people who lack the ability to think beyond themselves, the pinnacle of provinciality. 

Most often, the parents demanding book removals from school libraries see the world in a severely limited way. It is a form of magical thinking that frames all issues into an odd combination of advocacy and promotion. Because so many of them operate based on nothing but faith, they are unable to grasp the concept of presenting ideas just for discussion or as a challenge to preconceived notions. This is threatening to the magical thinker because an alternate view only exists to lure them away from the absolute certainty of the system they follow. For example, Yoga cannot be positive in its purest form because it has a spiritual component. That automatically means there is evil encoded in its rituals and one must be on guard against its conniving ways. For the magical thinker, the only good alternate idea is one that has been co-opted by their belief system.

Take a look at karate if you don't believe me. I'll even make it easy for you. Take a look at this website. Read their bullshit spin job on the history of martial arts where they try to justify their outright theft or cultural appropriation by citing other cultures with martial arts traditions from the ancient world that were not Asian in origin. They weren't Christian either but who needs details to spoil a good lie? They even somehow include creationism and the absurd claim that Earth is 6,000 years old as a method for whitewashing their use of  a non-Christian fighting art. If they have concerns over the "strong occult powers entrenched in Asian practice," why don't they practice one of the other arts they mention from Egypt and Pakistan? 

Quick answer: They don't need to. They already control the narrative.

But they don't control the narrative of books like "The Bridge" or Art Spiegelman's "Maus," another title these tireless parental crusaders have gone after because it makes their sensibilities all squirmy. The latter is an even more egregious example of book banning. These close-minded individuals took this man's father's life experience during the Holocaust and got rid of it because there is foul language and some nudity. One parent even accused the school library of "promoting" these things by carrying the book. Once more we return to magical thinking, where no idea is up for discussion because it only exists to disrespect the Absolute Truth. Instead of talking about these elements of a story and placing them in proper context, i.e. the supposed "sexual explicit behavior" in Konigsberg's book of which there is none. I read it.

I read "Maus" too. So I can tell you without fear of contradiction that only a person with little to no ability to use basic cognition would be offended by it or even want to prevent their teenaged child from reading it.

Despite my obvious disdain for the realm of dogmatic reactionary claptrap coming from the majority of these parent watchdogs, there is another aspect to all of this that I feel is being either ignored or going unnoticed. 

Much of what gets read these days is fluff. It's been that way for decades, especially in the mainstream Fiction world. Sadly, there are two celebrities we can thank for that. Oprah started it with her book club and Reese Witherspoon has continued it with hers. Both of these women, neither of them authors of fiction, do what most non-experts do when it comes to selecting titles for their respective clubs. They choose what they like based on how the books make them feel. Sometimes there's a challenge embedded in the stories, but somehow things usually work out favorably by the end. Discomfort becomes a temporary thing, the method by which the reader can be transported into a tale that will ultimately make them feel good about themselves and the choices they have made in life.

That is, of course, a generalization. I know Oprah recommended books such as "The Bluest Eye" by Toni Morrison which, by no means, ends in a mostly positive place. And I'm not even referring to the book clubs these two famous actors endorse as trash peddlers. There are plenty of quality works on their lists. But the readership is not looking for stories that pull them too far out of their comfort zones. And if adults feel this way, they naturally assume they must protect children from the opposite as well.

Discomfort is important. Vonnegut's "Slaughterhouse Five" wasn't written so that we could applaud the bombing of Dresden. He was there. He lived it. And just like Spiegelman, he wanted to share that part of himself with the world in an attempt to help his fellow humans understand what we are capable of and why we must expose ourselves to things that don't make us feel good about ourselves. Not all reading is for entertainment. I would expect even the least educated parents out there to know that titles in a school library are there because students can learn from them. 

Even when they have naughty words and side-boob and make us wonder if our beliefs suck and need to be changed.

Tuesday, February 1, 2022

Quote of the Month

 It's only the first but this lengthy one has already earned it spot the Quote of the Month! Written as a comment on an article asking why so many "Latinx" TV series get cancelled, this imagined dialogue was one of the responses:


White people: Bro! Did you know that you don't really have a gender neutral/all inclusive word for Latinos or Latinas?
Latinos: uhhh... yeah. Well we don't really have a need for...
White People: WE GOT IT! How about we just start calling all of you Latinx instead!? That way we won't offend any of you!
Latinos:.... let's get this straight. You just invented a word outta thin air, so that you could fix our language? Yeah... that's pretty insulti...
White People: NO NEED TO THANK US!!! We love coming up with solutions to problems that never existed!!! 😁👍
Latinos: 😑🖕

Monday, January 31, 2022

Quote of the Month

 The Quote of the Month comes on the very last day of January from a Facebook poster responding to mental furball Candace Owens' latest idiotic comment (below):





The quote follows:

"Why do conspiracy theorists question everything but the conspiracy theory?"



Friday, January 28, 2022

CLOSING THE DOOR ON SHERRY SHRINER

 

On July 19, 2010 I posted what I thought was a humorous piece on a bizarre group of people on Facebook whose belief system was so far out there, I thought it was satire. That post, which you can read by clicking here, began a several years' long fascination on my part with this charisma-free individual and her increasingly demented claims. 

Her followers did not find me amusing, as evidenced by the post above, and soon the novelty wore off and I decided to look into their leader. What I found was a hodgepodge of conspiracy theories with roots stretching back to anti-Semitic beliefs, Hollywood-inspired tales of aliens, and astoundingly odd misreading of the Christian Bible. Despite what was already enough to convince me the woman was mentally unbalanced, it was when I heard her speak that I knew for sure she was dangerous.

I listened to several of her podcasts and even suffered through one of her rambling, schizophrenic "books" because I just couldn't believe there were other people taking her seriously. Eventually, I started writing about her and her cult of adherents. I published the articles on Suite101 with the intention of trying to figure out if Shriner was a con artist or a true lunatic. I reached the conclusion that she was somehow, paradoxically, both. There really is such a thing as believing one's own bullshit, and no one excelled at it the way Sherry Shriner did.

After a while, it stopped being fun. People enjoyed the articles well enough, but they seemed to fall into one of two camps: The Dismissives, who felt Shriner deserved no attention at all, and the Popcorn Munchers, who looked forward to a good laugh. I was neither. There was something dangerous about this mush-mouthed individual, something dark and horrifying. I had gone from intense amusement at the outset to fascination to finally wariness. 

While I looked in on Shriner's antics from time to time over the next decade, I didn't feel the need to write about her. Others were already doing that, some of whom were doing a good job. Still others were just out there as she, calling her a false prophet instead of dangerously mentally ill. Some even accused her of being the shapeshifting reptilian alien she labeled others as being. I was not the first person to write about her, but it seemed like most others were more concerned in proving she was wrong in favor of their own ideologies. Clearly a war was being waged between extremists in the world of self-righteous zealots. 

The years passed and more dangerous paranoids took the stage, most notably Alex Jones. The QAnon movement seemed to encompass all ludicrous theories in a similar way to Shriner but with even more frightening effectiveness. Shriner was becoming a dinosaur in an era where her teachings were little more than an Internet footnote. Her voice had receded into the background of a rising cacophony of illogical, truth-bending, reality-denying imbeciles all believing their uninformed opinions to be equal to proven fact. I almost longed for the "charm" of her silly claims and assertions. Then I found out somebody was killed because of her and everything changed.

Actually, let's take a step back to 2012, not long after I had stopped paying much attention to Shriner and her wacked out cadre of supposed Orgone Warriors. Somehow, a story did not catch my notice that year, perhaps because it was a pivotal year of change for me. Apparently, a young woman from my home state who actually didn't live all that far from me committed suicide in a nearby park so she could be reborn as a spirit warrior in Shriner's so-called cause. Her name was Kelly Pingilley and she was, by all accounts, most likely an undiagnosed delusional schizophrenic who desperately wanted to understand the voices and urges in her head. Shriner preyed on people like her.

An event I did know about was the suicide and possible murder of former Shriner acolyte Steve Mineo in 2017. Mineo supposedly asked his girlfriend to shoot him in the head because he couldn't handle all of the online harassments from Shriner's followers coupled with his inability to expose her as a fraud. The details of the shooting are bizarre and covered in length on the Vice docu-series "The Devil You Know." But you can read a more detailed account here.

Shriner immediately went into self-preservation mode, blaming the girlfriend by branding her a vampire and a demon and shapeshifter and a clone and whatever else dropped out of her evil ass. She blamed NATO for Mineo's death, which she claimed was part of a psyop being waged against her because of her dangerous status as God's holy messenger.

First of all...NATO??? Secondly, how could Mineo's girlfriend be all of those things at the same time? She even used doctored photos to make it seem as if the woman had been replaced with an older-looking clone.

Who knows what other horrific things she caused during her time online? She was an unrepentant opportunist to whom human life clearly meant very little. Her "ministry" was her source of income and she milked it for all it was worth. 

Shriner died of a heart attack on January 28th, 2021, most likely caused by her reported chain-smoking problem. One would think a movement so strongly identified with its originator would die off with that person gone. One would be wrong. The Facebook page devoted to Shriner continues under her daughter's moderation and many claim Sherry wasn't killed at all. One person even wrote that she was "disappeared" by NATO and will re-emerge brainwashed,  refuting everything she taught. All I could write back was, "Now THAT'S how you keep a swindle going!"

That is most likely my final word on the subject of Sherry Shriner, warbley-voiced, poorly spoken, hostile and undeniably insane self-appointed Messenger of the Most High and purveyor of every batshit crazy conspiracy theory ever devised. May she fade into the background of collective memory until she is little more than footnote. 


Tuesday, January 18, 2022

CONGRATULATIONS TO THE HORROR ZINE

The Horror Zine has once again won several categories in the Critters annual poll. I am proud to have had my work published by them more than once over the years and look forward to working with them in the near future. 









Subscribe to my Substack!